Articles
DOI DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18485632

Green Transition Readiness and Performance in Agriculture. Evidence from Western Ukraine

Abstract

This study examines whether regional readiness for green transition practices is associated with better agricultural-economic performance in Western Ukraine. Because farm-level readiness data are not consistently available, the paper builds a transparent set of oblast-level readiness proxies using official statistics on (i) (i) (i) (i) the share of sown area treated with mineral fertilisers, organic fertilisers, and pesticides, and (ii) mineral fertiliser intensity (kg per hectare). Performance is measured using gross regional product (GRP) as an auditable macro proxy for regional economic outcomes during the overlapping period covered by publicly accessible statistical publications. The empirical strategy applies fixed-effects regressions with year controls and robustness checks using alternative index construction. Results indicate that the composite readiness index is not robustly associated with higher regional performance in the short sample window, while individual input-intensity components show statistically detectable within-region associations that are sensitive to specification and the limited time coverage. The findings suggest that, under data constraints and wartime disturbances, aggregate economic indicators may not immediately reflect environmental-practice reahighlightinghasising the need for longer panels and sector-specific value-added measures. The paper contributes a replicable, data-auditable workflow for green-readiness measurement using official statistics, with clear limitations and directions for improving inference.

How to Cite

Mustafayev, A. (2025). Green Transition Readiness and Performance in Agriculture. Evidence from Western Ukraine. Transnational Academic Journal of Economics, 2(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18485632

References

  1. Barbier, E. B. (2020). Greening the post-pandemic recovery in the G20. Environmental and Resource Economics, 76, 685–703.
  2. Brunnermeier, S. B., & Cohen, M. A. (2003). Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45(2), 278–293.
  3. Derzhstat (State Statistics Service of Ukraine). (2023). Use of fertilizers and pesticides under the harvest of agricultural crops (statistical publication).
  4. Derzhstat (State Statistics Service of Ukraine). (2023). Gross regional product (2004–2021) (statistical archive).
  5. FAO. (2011). Save and Grow: A policymaker’s guide to the sustainable intensification of smallholder crop production. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  6. Fuglie, K. O. (2018). R&D capital, R&D spillovers, and productivity growth in world agriculture. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 40(3), 421–444.
  7. Ghisetti, C., & Pontoni, F. (2015). Investigating policy and R&D effects on environmental innovation: A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 118, 57–66.
  8. Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605–654.
  9. IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press.
  10. Jordà, Ò. (2005). Estimation and inference of impulse responses by local projections. American Economic Review, 95(1), 161–182.
  11. OECD. (2011). Towards Green Growth. OECD Publishing.
  12. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment–competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.
  13. Pretty, J., Toulmin, C., & Williams, S. (2011). Sustainable intensification in African agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 9(1), 5–24.
  14. Schmidhuber, J., & Tubiello, F. N. (2007). Global food security under climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(50), 19703–19708.
  15. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
  16. World Bank. (2020). World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains. World Bank.
  17. World Bank. (2022). Ukraine Economic Update (selected issues on agriculture and recovery). World Bank.
  18. Zivot, E., & Andrews, D. W. K. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251–270.
  19. Rexhepi, B. R., Rexhepii, F. G., Xhaferi, B., Xhaferi, S., & Berisha, B. I. (2024). Financial accounting management: A case of Ege Furniture in Kosovo. Quality – Access to Success, 25(200). https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/25.200.09
  20. Daci, E., & Rexhepi, B. R. (2024). The role of management in microfinance institutions in Kosovo: Case study Dukagjini Region. Quality – Access to Success, 25(202). https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/25.202.22
  21. Rexhepi, B. R., Mustafa, L., Sadiku, M. K., Berisha, B. I., Ahmeti, S. U., & Rexhepi, O. R. (2024). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on construction companies and the primary housing market. Architecture Image Studies, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.48619/ais.v5i2.988
  22. Bai, J., & Perron, P. (2003). Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18(1), 1–22.
  23. Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.
  24. Arellano, M. (2003). Panel data econometrics. Oxford University Press.
  25. Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.