Reviewer Guideline
This guide is designed to simplify and streamline the work process for reviewers. It is recommended that you watch the "Reviewer's Steps" video to complete the review process using the Article Tracking System.
Reviewers are assigned to critically read and evaluate an article in their area of expertise. Reviewers are expected to provide respectful, constructive and honest feedback on articles. It is important for reviewers to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the article, make suggestions to improve its quality, and assess whether the work is original.
Before Evaluation:
Expertise Match: Pay attention to whether the article is compatible with your area of expertise. If not, inform the editor and suggest an alternative reviewer.
Time Commitment: Reviews should be completed within four weeks. If this is not possible, inform the editor and suggest a change.
Conflict of Interest: If there is any conflict of interest, inform the editor before reviewing.
During the Review:
Content Quality and Originality: Assess whether the article presents new perspectives and meets the journal's standards. Check whether the research makes a significant contribution to the field.
Organization and Clarity: Evaluate the clarity of the title, abstract, introduction, methods, findings and conclusion. Check that information is presented logically and that data, tables, figures and illustrations are clear.
Scope: Make sure that the manuscript fits the journal's objectives and scope.
Comment and Evaluation
Confidentiality: Keep all content private and do not share it with third parties without permission.
Ethical Issues: Report any suspected plagiarism, fraud or ethical violations to the editor.
Final Steps:
Complete the "Referee Form" online by the deadline and complete the review process. Your review and recommendation will greatly influence the editor's decision.
Clearly indicate only comments for the editors and comments for the author(s). Contact the journal editor if you have any questions or concerns.
